Logo

Were Dalits prohibited from drinking water from wells in ancient times? Is there any evidence to support this claim?

09.06.2025 03:11

Were Dalits prohibited from drinking water from wells in ancient times? Is there any evidence to support this claim?

Even if a Dalit didn’t engage in any said impure activity or job, he or she would still be denied access to common well, because by birth they are considered to be ritually impure.

North or South, East or west - you can find Dalits facing the same issues when it comes to fetching water from common wells and ponds.

Source : Travancore Manual, Volume I, page number 196.

What if Supergirl was a baby and not a teenager when she left Krypton? Who do you think will find her? What do you think things would be like?

Where ever the concept of Varnashrama and ritual purity spread, this was the situation.

Inscription granted certain privileges to the professional people called Sayakars of Idalakkudi viz.,

"they are prohibited from drawing water from the wells of other castes; but have particular wells of their own near their inhabitations, round which they place the bones of animals, that they may be known and avoided.

Scientists just learned the age of America's deepest canyon - SFGATE

They were exempted from the payment of all dues with the exception of Padaippanam and Kappalvagai panam.

Medieval inscription time to time record caste disputes.

Evidence of this practice comes from early Buddhist literature. The story of Ananda and the Chandali girl Prakrit is an example. The story is found in Divyavadana - a collection of early Buddhist legends.

Why are perceived or real slights interpreted as rejections and reality by pwBPD?

Pre modern times :

Every house had a well and no one stopped Dalits so on.

The medieval Chōla era the indigenous early settlers were relegated to the status of Avarnas and they were given space to live outside villages and towns. They had separate ponds, cremation grounds, so as to not ritually pollute others.

No. 2 Baseball comes up short against UTSA, 9-7 - University of Texas Athletics - University of Texas Athletics

They were allowed to appear before the sovereign during the royal processions.

Avarnas were people who were perceived to be doing ritually unclean jobs - not necessarily actual unclean jobs. For example, Toddy tappers were considered impure. Because, toddy tapping was considered impure.

Even today a lot of villages only have common wells and ponds. Not every rural house has a well.

Stock Market News, June 3, 2025: Nasdaq Moves Higher; OECD Cuts U.S. Growth Outlook - WSJ

The story goes like this : Parched in the hot sun, Ananda approached a girl fetching water and asks her for water.

One such dispute is recorded in a granite pillar in the Parasuraman Peruntheru, Idalakudi, Nagercoil, dated to 661 M.E (Malayalam Era), that is 1486 AD

And that Dalits dealt with corpses that’s why others fetched water for them.

Vancouver Whitecaps lose Concacaf Champions Cup final to Cruz Azul - MLSsoccer.com

They (Dalits) can ask any of us to fetch the water for them and we will oblige. But they cannot do it on their own. This practice has been there for ages and it cannot be changed,”

The well the girl was using is meant for Avarnas. The touch of an avarna is considered impure and hence she hesitates giving water to Ananda.

A note on the Paraiyans, Sonnerat, writing in the eighteenth century, says that,

Trump tariffs expected to dampen global economic growth, OECD says - The Washington Post

I read another answer which is nothing but apologetics for the evil system. The OP claims :

Even as recently as 18th century, the custom of keeping away Dalits from the common wells was in practice.

They were freed from persecution at the hands of Brahmins, Pillaimars and others who were in the habit of obstructing their passage to take water from tanks and wells, by putting up fences of thorns etc, assaulting and exacting unreasonable dues from them and interfering with and interrupting them in their public religious performances. Their residence was also prescribed within certain limits.

POLL: ESPN writer stokes the flames of Lions trading for All-Pro EDGE - Pride Of Detroit

In December 1937, the Bombay High Court ruled that untouchables have the right to use water from the tank. It took ten years for the Dalits to get justice.

When an Indian of any other caste permits a Paraiya to speak to him, this unfortunate being is obliged to hold his hand before his mouth, lest the Indian may be contaminated with his ​breath; and, if he Is met on the highway, he must turn on one side to let the other pass.

In 1927, Ambedkar launched a satyagraha to allow untouchables to use water in a public tank in Mahad (currently in Raigad district), Maharashtra, India.

IO Interactive Reveals 007 First Light, Full Trailer Out This Week - Game Informer

So no matter what job the Avarnas choose , their touch was/is considered impure by casteists who stick to the practice of ritual purity.

I am not sure whether Sayakkars were classified as Avarnas, but they were harassed for taking water from tanks and wells. The issue was taken before the government and they were given retrieve.

Yes. Avarnas were generally prohibited from deinking or fetching water from common wells and ponds. They had their separate wells and ponds.

Why were the Japanese soldiers in WW II so hesitant to surrender in battle?

One of the caste Hindus told ‘The Hindu’:

If any Indian whatever, even a Choutre, by accident touches a Paraiya, he is obliged to purify himself in a bath.

Shockingly, the practice of keeping away Dalits from common wells, continues to this day in some places.

For those who were actually old enough to have experienced the 1970s and not for those who were born in the 70s. What were the pros and cons of that era?

On March 20, 1927, Ambedkar and his followers marched to the Chavdar Lake, where he drank water from it, asserting their right of equality and equal access to public resources.

The Brāhmans cannot behold them, and they are obliged to fly when they appear. Great care is taken not to eat anything dressed by a Paraiya, nor even to drink out of the vessel he has used; they dare not enter the house of an Indian of another caste; or, if they are employed in any work, a door is purposely made for them; but they must work with their eyes on the ground; for, if it is perceived they have glanced at the kitchen, all the utensils must be broken.

There were Paraicheri for Paraiyars, Kammalancheri for Kammalas, Ilai Cheri for toddy tappers so on. Some inscriptions mention Theendacheri (untouchable hanlet) - the term Cheri is still in use and is usually a reference to slums.

Newark Airport to open its shuttered runway Monday, 13 days ahead of schedule - NBC News

The text itself is variously dated from 2nd century CE to 4th century CE, but the legends are believed to be older.

When Ambedkar became a professor of political economy in the Sydenham College of Commerce and Economics in Mumbai, other professors objected to his sharing a drinking-water jug with them.

And,

Gotham TV Awards: ‘Adolescence,’ ‘The Pitt’ & ‘The Studio’ Among Big Winners - Deadline

Hope these modern so called Shudra priests actually learn the history of discrimination in the subcontinent instead of doing apologetics.

From ‘Castes and tribes of India’ :

History stands as a testimony to the atrocities committed on the oppressed section.

The girl replies, ‘I am a Chandali’

Mahad Satyagraha -

Ananda replies, ‘I didn’t ask for your caste’ ‘I asked for some water’